[CIMdata + ChapsVision Webinar] Agentic AI: Moving Beyond Experiments to Enterprise Impact | March 18 • 12 PM ET Register now

EN Chat with Sinequa Assistant
AssistantAssistant

Save Time and Lives in R&D with Sinequa Scientific Search

Research and Development

The AI Search Platform for Drug Discovery and Development Teams

Over 50% of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies choose Sinequa.

Scientific knowledge in pharmaceutical R&D is vast, fragmented, and spread across systems that were never designed to talk to each other: electronic lab notebooks, LIMS, internal compound databases, clinical repositories, regulatory archives, and an ever-expanding body of public scientific literature. Researchers spend significant time searching for information that exists within their organization and even more time not finding it and duplicating work as a result.

Sinequa Scientific Search connects all of it. One interface. Every source. Natural language queries against the full depth of your organization’s scientific knowledge, so researchers can focus on science, not search.

Who This Solution Sheet Is For

This resource is written for life sciences leaders responsible for R&D productivity, knowledge access, and research technology strategy:

  • Drug discovery scientists and research directors who need fast access to compound data, target profiles, assay results, and scientific literature across internal and external sources
  • R&D IT leaders and informatics heads evaluating AI search platforms for complex scientific data environments including ELNs, LIMS, and proprietary databases
  • Heads of Research Operations building the case for a unified scientific knowledge infrastructure to accelerate TPP creation and reduce discovery cycle time
  • CDOs and innovation leaders in pharma assessing how AI-powered search can reduce duplicated research effort and connect institutional knowledge across therapeutic areas

What You’ll Learn

  • How leading pharma organizations use Sinequa Scientific Search to accelerate drug discovery from target identification through TPP creation
  • Why unifying scientific data sources across ELNs, LIMS, public databases, and proprietary platforms is the foundational step in any R&D AI strategy
  • How machine learning applied to scientific content surfaces patterns and connections that manual search cannot
  • What defines a successful scientific search strategy in high-performing life sciences R&D teams and how to evaluate platforms against it

Download the Solution Sheet

The Scientific Knowledge Problem in Pharmaceutical R&D

Pharmaceutical R&D organizations are among the most knowledge-intensive enterprises in the world. A single drug development program generates thousands of experimental results, literature references, regulatory documents, formulation records, and safety observations across its lifecycle. A large pharma organization running dozens of concurrent programs across multiple therapeutic areas generates this at a scale that no manual knowledge management approach can organize effectively.

The problem this creates is not data scarcity — it is knowledge inaccessibility. The data exists. The insights it contains exist. The question is whether researchers can locate and act on those insights at the point of need: when a medicinal chemist is designing the next analogue series, when a pharmacologist is selecting an assay cascade for a new target, when a regulatory scientist is preparing a submission and needs to locate prior agency responses on analogous safety questions.

Scientific search is the infrastructure layer that makes this possible. It is distinct from general enterprise search in two important ways. First, it handles the specific data types of scientific R&D: structured assay data, compound registration records, genomic annotations, experimental protocols, ELN entries, LIMS records, and scientific literature — not just document files and email. Second, it applies semantic understanding tuned to scientific vocabulary — understanding that a query about a specific kinase target is also relevant to assay results, patent filings, literature, and internal compound data associated with that target, even when the query uses different terminology than the source documents.

The consequence of poor scientific search is measurable in two dimensions that matter directly to drug development economics: duplicated research effort (running experiments that have already been run because the results are not findable) and delayed decision-making (slower TPP creation, longer target validation cycles, less-informed go/no-go decisions). Both compound across programs and across the R&D portfolio.

What Is Sinequa Scientific Search?

Sinequa Scientific Search is an AI-powered search platform purpose-built for pharmaceutical and life sciences R&D environments. It connects the full range of scientific data sources that drug discovery and development teams depend on — applying machine learning to understand scientific queries, surface relevant information across all connected sources simultaneously, and enable researchers to find the connections and patterns that accelerate R&D decisions.

  • Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELNs) and LIMS. Experimental data generated in ELNs and Laboratory Information Management Systems is among the most valuable and least accessible knowledge in pharmaceutical R&D. Sinequa indexes ELN entries and LIMS records — structured and semi-structured experimental data — making them searchable alongside documents, literature, and database records in a unified query interface.
  • Public scientific databases. Drug discovery researchers depend on external data sources: PubMed, patent databases, clinical trial registries, genomic databases, protein structure repositories, and compound libraries. Sinequa connects to public scientific databases alongside internal sources, enabling researchers to search across internal experimental results and external literature simultaneously — without switching between systems or reconciling results from separate searches.
  • Proprietary compound and target databases. Internal compound registration systems, target libraries, and safety databases contain the accumulated intellectual property of the organization’s R&D history. Sinequa indexes these proprietary sources with the security controls required to protect IP — ensuring that researchers can find relevant compound data and prior safety observations without exposing sensitive records to unauthorized access.
  • Scientific literature and regulatory documents. Publications, patents, regulatory submissions, and internal scientific reports form the contextual backbone of any R&D program. Sinequa applies NLP models trained on scientific and biomedical language to extract entities (genes, proteins, compounds, indications, mechanisms) and relationships from unstructured text — making scientific literature as searchable by concept and relationship as structured database records.

How Scientific Search Accelerates the Drug Discovery and Development Lifecycle

The value of AI-powered scientific search is realized at specific, identifiable points in the R&D lifecycle — not as a general productivity improvement, but as a decision-quality and decision-speed accelerator at the stages where information gaps are most costly.

  • Target identification and validation. Early-stage drug discovery requires rapid synthesis of information about potential targets: existing literature on target biology, internal experimental data from prior programs, competitive patent landscape, and safety signals from related targets. Scientific search that spans all of these sources enables target assessment that would take weeks of manual literature review to complete in hours — directly compressing the timeline from hypothesis to validated target.
  • Target Product Profile (TPP) creation. The TPP is the strategic document that defines what a successful drug candidate must achieve — and its quality depends on the completeness of the information that informs it. Prior clinical data, competitive product profiles, patient population data, and regulatory precedent all contribute. Organizations with unified scientific search infrastructure create TPPs grounded in the full body of available evidence; organizations without it create TPPs based on whatever their teams can find manually in the time available.
  • Hit identification and lead optimization. Medicinal chemistry teams designing new compound series need rapid access to SAR (structure-activity relationship) data from prior programs, assay results for related scaffolds, and ADMET profiles for analogous compounds. Scientific search that connects compound databases, assay repositories, and ELN data enables chemists to build on prior work rather than repeat it — a direct reduction in synthesis cycles and assay campaigns.
  • Safety and regulatory intelligence. Throughout development, safety teams and regulatory scientists need to locate prior observations — both internal and in published literature — on safety signals, metabolite profiles, drug-drug interaction patterns, and regulatory precedent. The speed and completeness with which these searches can be conducted affects both the quality of safety assessments and the efficiency of regulatory submission preparation.

Scientific Search vs. Clinical Data Search — Understanding the Distinction

Sinequa serves the pharmaceutical R&D lifecycle with two complementary search capabilities that address different data environments and different user communities.

  • Sinequa Scientific Search is designed for the drug discovery and early development environment: ELNs, LIMS, compound databases, scientific literature, target and assay repositories, and public scientific databases. Its users are research scientists, medicinal chemists, pharmacologists, and R&D informatics teams. Its primary use cases are target identification, compound selection, SAR analysis, and scientific literature synthesis.
  • Sinequa Clinical Data Search is designed for the clinical development environment: SAS analysis datasets, clinical study reports, protocols, regulatory submission archives, and clinical databases. Its users are clinical statisticians, data managers, and clinical operations teams. Its primary use cases are historical study analysis, protocol design support, and regulatory intelligence.

The two capabilities share the same underlying platform architecture — unified retrieval, semantic understanding, enterprise-grade security, and multi-source connectivity — but are configured for the distinct data types, vocabularies, and workflow patterns of their respective user communities. For organizations that operate across both discovery and clinical development, both capabilities can be deployed on the same Sinequa platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sinequa Scientific Search is an AI-powered search platform for pharmaceutical R&D teams that connects and indexes scientific data sources — including ELNs, LIMS, compound databases, public scientific literature, and proprietary repositories — enabling researchers to find insights across all connected sources through a single natural language search interface.

Sinequa Scientific Search connects to electronic lab notebooks (ELNs), LIMS platforms, internal compound and target databases, scientific literature databases (including PubMed and patent databases), clinical data repositories, regulatory document archives, and general enterprise content systems. The connector ecosystem covers both standard scientific informatics platforms and proprietary internal systems.

Sinequa Scientific Search is designed for drug discovery and early development environments — ELNs, LIMS, compound databases, and scientific literature — serving research scientists, chemists, and pharmacologists. Sinequa Clinical Data Search is designed for clinical development environments — SAS datasets, clinical study reports, and regulatory submissions — serving clinical statisticians and data managers. Both operate on the same Sinequa platform and can be deployed together for organizations that span discovery through clinical development.

Scientific search accelerates drug discovery by making prior experimental results, literature findings, and compound data findable at the point of need — reducing duplicated research effort, compressing target validation timelines, enabling more complete TPP creation, and supporting more informed go/no-go decisions. The primary mechanism is replacing manual multi-system search with unified, semantically-aware retrieval that surfaces relevant information across all connected sources simultaneously.

A Target Product Profile (TPP) is the strategic document that defines the desired clinical and commercial characteristics of a drug candidate — its intended indication, target patient population, efficacy requirements, safety profile, and differentiation from existing therapies. Scientific search supports TPP creation by making the full body of relevant prior data — internal experimental results, competitive intelligence, clinical precedent, regulatory guidance — accessible and synthesizable at the time of TPP development, rather than relying on whatever teams can assemble through manual search.

Stay updated!
Sign up for our newsletter

Over 50% of the world's leading pharmaceutical companies already choose Sinequa

Pfizer logo
Astellas logo
Takeda logo
Astrazeneca logo
Novartis logo
Bristol Myers Squibb logo
Sinequa is simply great technology. We immediately saw its benefit watching it perform something we didn’t know was possible. It makes an exponential difference for our organization. We were also impressed with the number of smart connectors available out-of-the-box and Sinequa’s unique ability to develop new ones.

Oliver Thoennessen, Senior Manager Global IT Drug Development, UCB